Alephys

Our Locations : Hyderabad, Texas, Singapore

Menu

Confluent

Transitioning Confluent Platform from ZooKeeper to KRaft

Leave a Comment / Confluent /

The Apache Kafka ecosystem is undergoing its most significant architectural evolution: the transition from ZooKeeper to KRaft (Kafka Raft Metadata mode). By integrating a native Raft-based consensus system directly into Kafka, the platform eliminates the complexity of external coordination, resulting in a more scalable, resilient, and operationally streamlined architecture. Confluent Platform supports this transition through three primary pathways: Manual Migration, Ansible Automation, and Confluent for Kubernetes (CFK). This guide explores the three-state journey to KRaft and the critical considerations for a successful cutover. Why the Move to KRaft? The shift to KRaft is a fundamental requirement for the future of Kafka. The 3 States of Migration Regardless of the tool you use, the journey follows three distinct operational states. This phased approach ensures data integrity and allows for validation before the final cutover. State Mode Operational Reality State 1 ZooKeeper Mode The Baseline: The cluster operates traditionally. ZooKeeper handles all metadata (leader elections, configs, and ACLs). Brokers are unaware of KRaft. State 2 Dual-Write Mode The Bridge: KRaft Controllers are active. Metadata is synchronized between ZooKeeper and KRaft in real-time. This is the last point where a rollback is possible. State 3 KRaft-Only Mode The Destination: Migration is finalized. ZooKeeper is decommissioned. The cluster is now simpler and faster. Rollback is no longer possible. Choosing Your Migration Path 1. Manual Migration (Classic Approach) Manual migration offers the most granular control. It is best suited for administrators who need to manage every step of the process without relying on external automation frameworks. 2. Automated Migration with Confluent Ansible If you manage Kafka on Virtual Machines or Bare Metal, Confluent Ansible provides a repeatable, “declarative” workflow. 3. Kubernetes-Native Migration with CFK For organizations running on Kubernetes, Confluent for Kubernetes (CFK) provides a fully orchestrated, cloud-native experience. The “One-Way Door”: What You Must Know Migration is a high-stakes operation. Adhering to these rules is non-negotiable. 1. The Point of No Return Once you move from State 2 (Dual-Write) to State 3 (KRaft-Only), you have crossed a “one-way door.” Brokers stop writing to ZooKeeper entirely. You can never roll back to ZooKeeper after finalization. Any failure after this point requires a brand-new cluster build. 2. Never “First Time” in Production Practice the full 3-state transition in a staging or QA environment that mirrors your production security (TLS/SASL) and data volume. 3. Backups are Non-Negotiable Before moving to State 2, take full backups of ZooKeeper data directories, broker configurations, and broker log directories. These are your only safety nets if State 2 fails. 4. Cluster ID Integrity KRaft controllers must be formatted with the exact same Cluster ID used by your current ZooKeeper ensemble. A mismatch will cause brokers to reject the new controllers, leading to a split-brain scenario or total downtime. 5. Don’t Mix Upgrade and Migration First, upgrade your Confluent Platform to a version that supports KRaft migration (7.7.x is recommended). Stabilize the cluster. Then, and only then, initiate the migration to KRaft. Conclusion Migrating to KRaft is more than just a version update; it is a foundational transformation of your data infrastructure. Whether you choose the control of a Manual approach, the scalability of Ansible, or the orchestration of CFK, the goal is a leaner, faster Kafka. Plan carefully, validate thoroughly in the Dual-Write state, and only close the “One-Way Door” when you are 100% confident in your new KRaft quorum. Ready to Seamlessly Migrate to KRaft? If you are planning the critical shift from ZooKeeper to KRaft and want to ensure a zero-downtime transition, Alephys is here to guide your journey. Navigating the “One-Way Door” requires precision. Whether you are validating Dual-Write performance, managing complex Ansible workflows, or orchestrating a Kubernetes-native cutover with CFK, our team of data experts ensures your infrastructure remains resilient. We help you eliminate the risks of split-brain scenarios and data loss so you can unlock the full scalability of a controller-less architecture with confidence. Author: Siva Munaga, Solution Architect at Alephys. Gireesh Krishna Paupuleti, Solution Architect at Alephys. I specialize in building scalable data infrastructure and executing complex Kafka migrations that modernize enterprise platforms. Let’s connect on LinkedIn to discuss your move to KRaft and your long-term infrastructure goals!  

Transitioning Confluent Platform from ZooKeeper to KRaft Read More »

Orchestrating Traffic: The Distinct Roles of Load Balancers, IPTables, and Nginx

Leave a Comment / Confluent /

In modern distributed architectures, designing a routing layer for high-throughput services—such as Apache Kafka clusters, RESTful microservices, or gRPC endpoints—requires a sophisticated understanding of traffic flow. It is standard practice to deploy Load Balancers (L4), IPTables (Netfilter), and Nginx (L7) in tandem. While these components may superficially appear to overlap, they operate at distinct layers of the OSI model and solve specific infrastructure challenges. This guide deconstructs these components to clarify their interoperability and specific roles within a production-grade traffic plane. 1. The Cloud Load Balancer: The High-Availability Ingress Operational Scope: Layer 4 (Transport Layer – TCP/UDP)The Cloud Load Balancer (e.g., AWS Network Load Balancer, Azure LB) serves as the ingress gateway for your infrastructure. It is responsible for the initial acceptance and distribution of raw TCP/UDP streams. Architecture Diagram Core Responsibilities The L4 Load Balancer acts as a pass-through mechanism that distributes connections based on the 5-tuple (Source IP, Source Port, Destination IP, Destination Port, Protocol). Architectural Limitations As a Layer 4 device, the Load Balancer is content-agnostic. It cannot inspect the data stream. Consequently, it is unaware of: 2. IPTables: Kernel-Level Packet Mangling Operational Scope: Layer 3/4 (Network/Transport Layer) IPTables is the user-space utility for configuring Netfilter, the packet filtering framework inside the Linux kernel. It governs how packets are processed immediately upon entering the network stack of a host VM. Architecture Diagram Core Responsibilities IPTables excels at Network Address Translation (NAT) and strictly defined access control lists (ACLs). It operates efficiently in kernel space before traffic reaches any application processes. Example: DNAT Rule for Port Forwarding iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp –dport 30000 -j REDIRECT –to-port 31000 Architectural Limitations IPTables is a stateless or simple stateful packet filter. It lacks application awareness: 3. Nginx: The Application Delivery Controller Operational Scope: Layer 7 (Application Layer)Nginx functions as a high-performance Reverse Proxy and Load Balancer. Unlike the previous components, Nginx terminates the TCP connection, inspects the payload, and makes intelligent routing decisions based on the content. Architecture Diagram Core Responsibilities Nginx serves as the “intelligence layer” of the routing stack. The Routing Workflow 4. Comparative Analysis: Netfilter vs. Reverse Proxy While both tools manage traffic flow, their scope of operation differs fundamentally. Feature IPTables (Netfilter) Nginx (Reverse Proxy) OSI Layer Layer 3/4 (Network/Transport) Layer 7 (Application) Routing Logic IP and Port-based Content, Hostname, & SNI-based TLS/SNI Awareness No (Encrypted traffic is opaque) Yes (Can terminate or inspect) Health Monitoring None (Blind forwarding) Active (Retries & Circuit Breaking) Observability Packet counters Granular Access & Error Logs 5. Strategic Advantages of Layer 7 Routing For complex distributed systems like Apache Kafka or multi-tenant microservices, relying solely on L3/L4 routing is insufficient. Here is why an Application Layer proxy (Nginx) is critical: 1. Granular Multi-Tenancy (SNI Routing) Modern architectures often expose multiple services via a single public endpoint. 2. Intelligent Failover & Self-Healing Reliability is non-negotiable. 3. Deep Observability Debugging network “black holes” is difficult with packet filters. Nginx provides rich telemetry: Summary: The Defense-in-Depth Architecture A robust production environment utilizes these components in a synergistic chain: By orchestrating these layers correctly, you ensure your architecture is not just connected, but resilient, observable, and secure. Ready to Architect a Resilient Routing Layer? If you’re aiming to deploy a zero-downtime routing strategy or need to optimize the traffic flow between your Cloud Load Balancers and Nginx, Alephys can help you engineer a network layer built for scale. Whether you’re troubleshooting complex SNI routing issues, automating intelligent failover logic, or hardening your host security with precision IPTables rules, our team of infrastructure engineers handles the architectural heavy lifting. We ensure your critical services achieve high availability and robust security, allowing you to scale confidently without traffic bottlenecks. Author: Gireesh Krishna Pasupuleti, Solution Architect at Alephys. Siva Munaga, Solution Architect at Alephys. We are specialize in designing high-throughput network architectures and securing distributed systems for modern enterprises. Let’s connect on LinkedIn to discuss your routing challenges and cloud infrastructure roadmap!

Orchestrating Traffic: The Distinct Roles of Load Balancers, IPTables, and Nginx Read More »

Monitoring Confluent Platform with Prometheus & Grafana

Leave a Comment / Confluent /

A Best-Practice Guide to JMX Exporter, Node Exporter, and Kafka Lag Exporter Modern event-driven platforms built on Confluent Platform and Apache Kafka require strong observability to operate reliably at scale. With multiple distributed components—Kafka Brokers, KRaft or ZooKeeper Controllers, Schema Registry, Kafka Connect, ksqlDB, and Control Center—effective monitoring is essential for: This guide explains how a Prometheus + Grafana monitoring stack, combined with purpose-built Kafka exporters, provides deep visibility across the application, JVM, and infrastructure layers of the Confluent ecosystem. The Observability Stack Prometheus – The Metrics Engine Prometheus is a high-performance, pull-based monitoring system designed for dynamic, distributed environments. It: Prometheus serves as the single source of truth for operational metrics in most Kafka monitoring architectures. Grafana – The Visualization Layer Grafana provides the visualization and user interface layer for observability. When connected to Prometheus, it enables: Grafana acts as the “single pane of glass” for Kafka operators and SRE teams. High-Level Architecture Overview The strength of this monitoring stack lies in its ability to aggregate metrics from multiple layers: Consumers → Lag and throughput indicators End-to-End Metrics Flow 1. JMX Exporter – JVM and Kafka Metrics All Kafka and Confluent Platform services are Java-based and expose internal performance metrics via JMX (Java Management Extensions). Since Prometheus cannot scrape JMX directly, the JMX Exporter is used as a bridge. Role Deployment Best Practice Commonly Monitored Metrics Example Java Agent Configuration -javaagent:/opt/jmx_prometheus_javaagent.jar=<PORT>:/opt/kafka-jmx.yml Best practice: Treat JMX Exporter metrics as signal-rich but expensive—collect what you need, not everything. 2. Node Exporter – Host-Level Metrics Kafka is both storage-intensive and network-intensive. Application-level metrics alone are insufficient without understanding the behavior of the underlying hosts.The Node Exporter provides visibility into operating system and hardware metrics. Role Why It’s Critical Node Exporter enables correlation between Kafka performance issues and infrastructure constraints such as: Key Metrics Best practice: Always analyze Kafka broker metrics alongside disk and network metrics—most Kafka bottlenecks originate at the OS layer. 3. Kafka Lag Exporter – Consumer Health and SLAs Consumer lag is one of the most important indicators of Kafka system health. It represents the gap between: The Kafka Lag Exporter calculates and exposes these metrics by connecting to Kafka as a client. Role Key Metrics Important Note on Time-Based Lag Time-based lag is an estimate, derived from recent throughput rates. It assumes: Best practice: Use time-based lag as a directional indicator, not an exact SLA measurement. Prometheus Scrape Configuration (Example) Prometheus is configured to scrape exporter endpoints at regular intervals. scrape_configs:– job_name: ‘kafka-jmx’    static_configs:      – targets: [‘<broker-ip>:<port>’]   – job_name: ‘node-exporter’    static_configs:      – targets: [‘<host-ip>:<port>’]   – job_name: ‘kafka-lag’    static_configs:      – targets: [‘<lag-exporter-ip>:<port>’] Best practice: In Kubernetes or cloud environments, use service discovery (Kubernetes SD, EC2 SD, Consul) instead of static targets. Resulting Operational Insights By combining JMX Exporter, Node Exporter, and Kafka Lag Exporter, Grafana dashboards can provide a holistic operational view: This layered observability approach allows teams to move from reactive firefighting to proactive optimization, ensuring that the Confluent Platform remains scalable, resilient, and performant under production workloads. Ready to Elevate Your Kafka Observability? If you’re looking to implement a production-grade monitoring stack or need to fine-tune your Confluent Platform performance, Alephys can help you architect a robust observability framework tailored to your infrastructure. Whether you’re troubleshooting persistent consumer lag, optimizing JMX metric cardinality, or designing high-availability Prometheus architectures, our team of data experts handles the technical complexities. We help you gain deep operational insights and maintain 99.9% uptime while you focus on delivering value to your customers. Author: Siva Munaga, Solution Architect at Alephys. I specialize in building scalable data infrastructure and observability solutions that keep modern event-driven applications running smoothly. Let’s connect on LinkedIn to discuss your Kafka monitoring challenges and infrastructure goals!  

Monitoring Confluent Platform with Prometheus & Grafana Read More »

Confluent Cloud Private Link: Secure, Private, and Simplified Networking for Modern Data Pipelines

Leave a Comment / Confluent /

As organizations continue shifting toward fully managed cloud data platforms, network security and connectivity architecture have become core priorities. Confluent Cloud—powered by Apache Kafka—addresses these challenges by deeply integrating with Private Link technologies from AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. By using Private Link, Confluent Cloud enables fully private, non-internet-exposed connections between customer environments and Kafka clusters. In this article, we explore how Confluent Cloud uses inbound and outbound Private Link endpoints, along with its Private Link Service (PLS), to deliver secure, compliant, and simplified data connectivity. What Is Private Link and Why It Matters Private Link technologies—including AWS PrivateLink, Azure Private Link, and GCP Private Service Connect (PSC)—allow organizations to establish direct, private communication paths between their VPCs/VNets and external cloud services. For Confluent Cloud users, this means Kafka clusters and connected systems can communicate without ever traversing the public internet. The result: reduced risk, simplified networking, and streamlined compliance. Important Note on Connectivity Options While Private Link provides service-level connectivity, Confluent Cloud also supports alternative private networking approaches for different architectural needs: VPC Peering: Offers full bidirectional connectivity but requires CIDR coordination AWS Transit Gateway: Simplifies multi-VPC architectures by acting as a cloud router; popular for large-scale deployments GCP VPC Peering: Similar to AWS peering for Google Cloud environments Private Link provides unidirectional, service-specific connectivity, making it ideal for organizations requiring strict access controls and simplified network architecture. Inbound Private Link Endpoints Inbound Private Link endpoints give customer applications a private IP path to Confluent Cloud Kafka clusters from within their own VPC or VNet. Why This Matters Secure Access – No public endpoints or public IP exposure Reduced Attack Surface – All traffic remains on the cloud provider’s private backbone Simplified Networking Across Regions – Eliminates the need for VPC peering, complex routing, or VPN setups Lower Latency & Higher Throughput – Direct connectivity through Private Link often results in measurably lower latency and higher throughput compared to public endpoints or complex routing architectures, improving application performance Inbound Private Link is the recommended method for securely connecting applications to Confluent Cloud. Outbound Private Link Endpoints Outbound endpoints allow Confluent Cloud services—such as managed connectors, ksqlDB, and other data processing components—to privately access systems running inside a customer’s environment. Why This Matters Secure Integration – Private access to internal databases, APIs, and applications Multi-Cloud Consistency – Works across AWS, Azure, and GCP with a uniform model. Confluent Cloud now supports cross-cloud Cluster Linking with private networking across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, enabling multi-region and multi-cloud strategies Compliance-Friendly – Sensitive data stays private and never requires public exposure Granular Access Control – Private Link provides granular mapping of endpoints to specific resources, restricting access to only the mapped service. In a security incident, only that specific resource would be accessible, not the entire peered network Important Operational Details Managed Connectors: Can use Egress Private Link Endpoints to access private internal systems, but they can still use public IP addresses to connect to public endpoints when Egress Private Link isn’t configured ksqlDB Provisioning: New ksqlDB instances require internet access for provisioning; they become fully accessible over Private Link connections once provisioned Schema Registry Internet Access: Confluent Cloud Schema Registry remains partially accessible over the internet even when Private Link is configured. Specifically, internal Confluent components (fully-managed connectors, Flink SQL, and ksqlDB) continue to access Schema Registry through the public internet using uniquely identified traffic that bypasses IP filtering policies. This must be accounted for in security and firewall planning Outbound Private Link is particularly valuable when connectors need to interact with internal databases or APIs securely. Private Link Service: The Core of the Architecture At the center of Confluent’s Private Link implementation is the Private Link Service (PLS). This service: Privately exposes Kafka clusters through endpoint connections Maps customer endpoints to Confluent-managed infrastructure using SNI (Server Name Indication) routing at Layer 7 Maintains stable, resilient connectivity even as brokers scale or rotate through SNI-based traffic routing, ensuring connectivity remains stable even when brokers are replaced or the underlying infrastructure changes PLS supports both inbound and outbound Private Link connections, ensuring a unified private networking model. Architecture Overview The flow below illustrates how Confluent Cloud’s Private Link model works end-to-end: All traffic remains completely private—no public ingress or egress required (except for noted Schema Registry internal component access and provisioning requirements). Key Benefits of Confluent Cloud Private Link 1. Enhanced Security Your data stays fully within the cloud provider’s private network. This dramatically reduces exposure and eliminates the need for public-facing endpoints. Private Link provides defense-in-depth through isolated service-level connections, ensuring that network access is restricted to only the specific Confluent Cloud resources you’ve explicitly configured. 2. Simplified Networking with Important Caveats With Private Link, you can avoid: VPC/VNet peering and associated CIDR coordination complexity VPNs with their associated latency and complexity NAT gateways and associated costs Traditional firewall reconfiguration for IP whitelisting Infrastructure becomes cleaner, easier to manage, and more scalable. However, simplified networking does require DNS configuration: Organizations must: Create private hosted zones in their DNS service (Route 53 for AWS, equivalent for Azure/GCP) Create CNAME records mapping Confluent domains to their VPC endpoints Ensure DNS requests to public authorities can traverse to private DNS zones While simpler than VPC peering, Private Link DNS configuration does have operational complexity that security and networking teams should account for. 3. Internet Connectivity Requirements Organizations implementing fully private networking with Private Link must understand that VPCs using Private Link still require outbound internet access for: Confluent Cloud Schema Registry access (particularly for internal component connectivity) ksqlDB provisioning and management Confluent CLI authentication DNS requests to public authorities (particularly important for private hosted zone delegation) Management and control plane operation This is a critical consideration for firewall rules and egress filtering policies. 4. Performance Improvements Direct connectivity through Private Link often results in lower latency and higher throughput compared to public endpoints or complex routing architectures. This translates to improved application performance and better data pipeline efficiency, particularly important for real-time streaming

Confluent Cloud Private Link: Secure, Private, and Simplified Networking for Modern Data Pipelines Read More »

Creating a Custom HTTP Source Connector for Kafka

Leave a Comment / Confluent /

Introduction Apache Kafka has become the backbone of modern data pipelines, enabling real-time data streaming at scale. While Kafka provides many built-in connectors through its Connect API, sometimes you need to create custom connectors to meet specific requirements. In this post, I’ll walk through creating a custom HTTP source connector that pulls data from REST APIs into Kafka topics. Why Build a Custom HTTP Connector? There are several existing HTTP connectors for Kafka, but you might need a custom one when: Prerequisites Before we begin, ensure you have: Step 1: Set Up the Project Structure Create a new Maven project with the following structure: Step 2: Add Dependencies to pom.xml Step 3: Implement the Configuration Class Create HttpSourceConfig.java to define your connector’s configuration: Step 4: Implement the Connector Class Create HttpSourceConnector.java: Step 5: Implement the Task Class Create HttpSourceTask.java: Step 6: Build and Package the Connector Run the following Maven command to build the connector: mvn clean package This will create a JAR file in the target directory. Step 7: Deploy the Connector To deploy your custom connector: Advanced Considerations Conclusion Building a custom HTTP source connector for Kafka gives you complete control over how data flows from REST APIs into your Kafka topics. While this example provides a basic implementation, you can extend it to handle more complex scenarios specific to your use case. Remember to thoroughly test your connector under various failure scenarios and monitor its performance in production. The Kafka Connect framework provides a solid foundation, allowing you to focus on the business logic of your data integration needs. Ready to Streamline Your Data Pipelines? If you’re looking to implement custom Kafka connectors or build robust data streaming solutions, Alephys can help you architect the perfect system tailored to your business needs and ease you through your process Whether you’re integrating complex APIs, optimizing data flow performance, or designing an enterprise-scale streaming architecture, our team of data experts will handle the technical heavy lifting. We help you unlock the full potential of real-time data while you focus on driving business value.Author: Siva Munaga, Solution Architect at Alephys. I specialize in building scalable data infrastructure and streaming solutions that power modern applications. Let’s connect on LinkedIn to discuss your Kafka and data integration challenges!

Creating a Custom HTTP Source Connector for Kafka Read More »

©2025 Alephys | All Rights Reserved.